Saturday, September 30, 2006

Secret Michael and McCartney Record Discovered

A previously unreleased duet between George Michael and Sir Paul McCartney will finally see the light of the day on a forthcoming greatest hits album. Michael's Twenty Five collection is scheduled for release in November (06) and will feature the McCartney track Hear The Pain. The Careless Whisper singer's greatest hits collection, which comprises hits from his Wham! and solo career, will also feature a song recorded exclusively for the album called Understand. George Michael began his full European tour in Barcelona last Saturday (23SEP06) - his first series of live shows in 15 years.

http://www.contactmusic.com/
news.nsf/article/secret%20michael
%20and%20mccartney%20record
%20discovered_1009625

Lennon: 'I'm Not My Dad'

Sean Lennon has hit out at critics who expect him to be exactly like his dad, the late Beatle John Lennon.The young musician, who is preparing to release his new album Friendly Fire, resents expectations that he should make the same music as his late father.He says, "What bothers me is when people don't know how I feel, but are looking at me anyway. That's what makes me uncomfortable, being in the public eye. People are projecting this idea on to me, like, 'I hate that Lennon kid.
He should be like his dad.'" Songs on Sean's new album was inspired by his break-up with singer/actress Bijou Phillips. He tells, "I have to say that I never have issues with putting out songs that are personal. I have this innate thing that I don't care."

http://www.pr-inside.com/
lennon-im-not-my-dad-r20574.htm

Brian Wilson credits the Beatles' inspiration for "Pet Sounds"

Brian Wilson says that like most of the songwriters and producers of the '60s the Beatles pushed him to do his best work. Wilson told the avclub.com that his inspiration to create the Beach Boys' Pet Sounds was due to feeling direct competition with the "Fab Four," recalling that, "I heard Rubber Soul one night in my house here in L.A., and I was so blown out that I said, 'I have to record an album as good or better than Rubber Soul. If I ever do anything in my life, I'm going to make that good an album.' And so we did."

Wilson said that he knew while recording Pet Sounds that he was creating a rock and roll masterpiece: "I knew when we were recording it. I knew it was going to be a milestone in musical history. And I knew we were on to something very, very good. The love vibes in Pet Sounds were very good."

Brian Wilson told us that he included the band's then-current single "Sloop John B." on Pet Sounds at the Beach Boys' record company's request: "No, I wanted it to be a single but when they said 'album,' I said 'fine,' that was okay with me. I said it would help the album. Y'know, it would help it sell and it would fit perfectly."

Pet Sounds was released on May 16th, 1966, and featured such Beach Boys classics as "Wouldn't It Be Nice," "God Only Knows" "Caroline No," "I Just Wasn't Made For These Times," and "Sloop John B."

The Beach Boys have just released a deluxe double disc version of the Pet Sounds album. The set includes newly remastered mono and stereo mixes of the album, as well as a DVD featuring a 5.1 Dolby Digital Surround sound mix and several featurettes, including an extended cut of the 1997 promotional film The Making Of Pet Sounds.

Brian Wilson will be performing a series of Pet Sounds 40th anniversary shows with Beach Boys co-founder Al Jardine as his special guest. The mini-tour kicks off on November 1st in Los Angeles at Royce Hall at UCLA.

In addition to the L.A. date, Wilson and Jardine have shows scheduled in Boston, Washington D.C., Glenside, Pennsylvania, and New York City.

http://www.therockradio.com/
2006/09/brian-wilson-
credits-beatles.html

Friday, September 29, 2006

Paul McCartney Says He's 'Doing Fine'

Paul McCartney says he's "doing fine," despite the turmoil surrounding the breakup of his marriage. McCartney, who appeared Monday at a news conference to launch his new classical album, "Ecce Cor Meum (Behold My Heart)," did not comment directly on his split from his second wife, Heather Mills McCartney.

Asked how he had been coping in recent months, McCartney said: "I'm doing fine thank you. It's OK.

"I'm enjoying music. It's something I love to do. It's something that sustains me. So I'm enjoying it, finishing this project off and also the next one."

McCartney said he started "Ecce Cor Meum" when his first wife, Linda, was still alive. After she died of breast cancer in 1998, "it stalled me," the 64-year-old former Beatle said.

"I took a year or so before I could get back into it. The interlude in the middle is a particularly sad melody and is what got me going again," he said. "Her spirit is very much in this. It would have been her birthday yesterday so it's very appropriate."

McCartney said the lyrics of "Ecce Cor Meum" were inspired by what he believes is important in life.

"When I came around to thinking, `what do I want the words to say?' I just wrote down a whole load of things that interest me about truth, about love, about honesty and about kindness. Stuff that I thought was important in life."

Paul and Heather Mills McCartney announced their separation in May after four years of marriage. They have begun divorce proceedings in an increasingly acrimonious split. The couple have a 2-year-old daughter, Beatrice.

"Ecce Cor Meum," which is being released by EMI Classics, is the pop star's fourth classical album. His first, "The Liverpool Oratorio," was released in 1991.

Britain's Magdalen College Oxford commissioned McCartney to create the music more than eight years ago in celebration of a new concert hall.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/
entertainment/sns-ap-people-
paul-mccartney,1,6260901.story?
coll=chi-entertainmentfront-hed

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

McCartney adds voice to hospital campaign

The 64-year-old former Beatle sent a message of support, saying it would be a "real shame" if vital services were cut back at the Conquest Hospital in St Leonards, East Sussex.

Sir Paul, who has a country estate in nearby Peasmarsh, near Rye, said: "Any cutback in medical services for this and any other region is a real shame."These are services for the people of the area and I for one support the efforts of the people who are trying to make sure that these closures don't happen." Last week,
more than 7,000 people marched along Hastings seafront in support of maintaining services such as Accident and Emergency and maternity at the hospital.

The rally was held as it emerged that more than 37,000 people have signed petitions backing the Hands Off The Conquest campaign.Friends of the Conquest Hospital secretary Margaret Williams said Sir Paul's endorsement of their efforts has lifted spirits.She said: "Having an endorsement from someone like Sir Paul really lifts the profile of the campaign."

http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/
ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=
55&ArticleID=1789457

Heather Mills threatens to drop “bombshell” on Paul McCartney

Heather Mills is not the only one whose reputation has taken a beating in her bitter divorce battle from estranged hubby Sir Paul McCartney, for she’s now threatening to do the same for him with some “bombshell” revelations.

According to reports, Mills' divorce lawyer Antony Julius, has already compiled a file of serious claims that the former model has made against Macca, and will be made public around the time of the divorce settlement.

A pal of Mills’ rubbished reports that the couple had found a way for an amicable arrangement, and that the model was now preparing to settle score for stories about her past that she believes have been leaked by Macca’s camp.

"Heather has made a number of very serious allegations against Paul which are set to come out in court. However, quite apart from that she feels that her character has been irrevocably damaged by a rash of stories which she is sure have been leaked out by Paul's side," the Daily Mail quoted the pal, as saying.

The friend insisted that as the divorce settlement draws closer, Mills will be going public with the claims, which are said to be “pretty serious”.

"As the divorce settlement gets closer, she is fully planning to go public with some pretty serious claims about how Paul treated her during the marriage. There is some serious weight behind all of these allegations" the friend added.

"Heather has made records of a catalogue of incidents which have happened during the marriage. There's a lot to say on Heather's part but she is not prepared to go public with it at this stage. She has been told by Antony Julius to keep her head down and let things take their legal course," the pal revealed.

And the friend also said that Mills’ revelations will be like a “bombshell” for McCartney.

"It's bombshell stuff - every one of these allegations would be front page news. Rest assured, if all goes to plan, what has happened in this marriage will not remain secret. The allegations will see the light of day. Heather will not want to go down in history as Evil Heather - the bad guy in this marriage," the pal insisted.

The source continued there had been a lot of innuendo from Macca’s camp to make Mills look ‘bad’ in the public’s eye. However, the animal rights activist was not prepared to take the accusations lying down, and is planning to give tit for tat.

"There has been a lot of innuendo to make her look very bad. For that reason, Heather is not going to be happy to go down in history without letting this all out"

"However until now - on the advice of her lawyers - she has been very careful to tell no one about these details," the source revealed.

Mills McCartney's Dad Slams 'Greedy' Daughter

Sir Paul McCartney's estranged wife Heather Mills McCartney has been branded "greedy" and "nasty" by her own father over reports she's set to win millions from the former Beatle in their divorce settlement.

Mark Mills, who has been estranged from his daughter for years after she accused him of abusing her as a child, insists the former model should know her limits.

He says, "I've read he's offered her 25 million or so -- she should take that and stop what she's doing. It's plenty.

"She's just being greedy. Just how much does she need?"

McCartney and Mills announced their split in May. They have a 2-year-old daughter, Beatrice, together.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/
blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=7&
entry_id=9279

Snoop Dogg and Dr Dre Update John Lennon’s Imagine

‘Imagine Russell still struggling/No Def Jam’ raps Snoop Dogg on his forthcoming album in a rather bizarre update of John Lennon’s classic ‘Imagine’.

Snoop and Dr Dre have collaborated on ‘The Blue Carpet Treatment’, Snoop’s new record. ‘Imagine’ will be their first thing together in 5 years.

According to Billboard, the album will feature special guests Stevie Wonder, The Game, Ice Cube and R. Kelly.

As well as Dre, The Neptunes, Timbaland and Rick Rock handle production duties.

‘The Blue Carpet Treatment’ will be released on November 21st.

http://www.undercover.com.au/
news/2006/sep06/20060926_
snoopdogg.html

New Book showcases the Beatles as artists see them

The music of the Beatles helped define the 1960's, and inspired not only musicians, but artists of the day who captured the spirit of John, Paul, George, and Ringo in their artwork. The Beatles continue to inspire artists, and some of the best examples of these images have been compiled by Boxigami Books into a new book called Beatles Art.

Beatles Art is a compilation of art from professional artists from all over the world, offering their own unique interpretations of The Beatles and their music. The artwork pictured ranges from traditional paintings to digital creations. In addition, the artists share how The Beatles impacted their art, their lives and the world.

From doodles to oil paintings, from collages to sculptures, Beatles Art captures the Beatles as they were in performance, on TV, in the media and as we remember them, from all the years the Beatles were together.

The foreword for Beatles Art was written by Jock Bartley from the US band Firefall, who shares his own thoughts on the Beatles in an open and honest way that genuinely sets the tone for the great art contained in the book. Jock is an artist, musician, and a Beatle fan, and so he brings his own unique perspective to the topic. In his foreword, Jock says:

"It's no secret. The Beatles are the best Rock and Roll band ever. They were back then, they are today and will always be. Paul, John, George and Ringo changed the entire world and human experience like no other group could ever hope to."

More than a pretty coffee table book, as you thumb through this book, you, your family and friends will find vivid images which spark your own memories of the times and events. It's a book that takes you away and you can easily get lost in its pages.

Beatles Art is a beautiful 10 1/2 x 12 soft cover book, 212 pages, including 150 full color images. For each book sold, Boxigami Books will donate $1 US to Adopt-A-Minefield.

http://www.whatgoeson.com/
gallery.bart-cover.html

McCartney mystified by the magic of ‘The Beatles’

It was only after Sir Paul McCartney saw ‘Love’ - a show inspired by his former band ‘The Beatles’, that he realized the true impact of their music.

Former Beatles MCCartney and Ringo Starr were among the first to see it, and Macca confessed that he'd never appreciated his musical success until that point.

"It was emotional because it's my mates, and because of the fact that it's no more, except on record - physically no more,” Contactmusic quoted him, as saying.

"In the middle of the show, I was sitting next to Ringo, I was welling up, and I just turned to him and said, 'F**king great band. Listen to these noises. How did we do that?'" he added.

Meanwhile, Sir Paul McCartney who has been going through a bitter divorce battle since past few months, has vowed to “start living again" after his split from wife Heather Mills.

http://news.sawf.org/
Entertainment/22073.aspx

Sunday, September 24, 2006

John Lennon, Still a Security Threat

We all know that a key to preventing future terrorist attacks is sharing intelligence with foreign governments. When Justice Department attorneys urge courts not to release national security information provided by a foreign government under a Freedom of Information Act suit, they argue that the courts should defer to the experts in the Department of Homeland Security and the White House.

But what if such intelligence isn't about today's terrorist threats? What if it's about the antiwar activities of a British rock star during the Vietnam War?

That's precisely what's at issue in a Freedom of Information Act suit pending before the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The case of John Lennon's FBI files illustrates the federal government's obsession with secrecy, which it justifies with appeals to national security.

Lennon's story, told in the documentary "The U.S. vs. John Lennon," opening this week in Los Angeles, revolves around his plans to help register young people to vote in the 1972 presidential election, when President Nixon was running for reelection and the war in Vietnam was the issue of the day. Lennon wanted to organize a national concert tour that would combine rock music with antiwar protests and voter registration. Nixon found out about the plan, and the White House began deportation proceedings against Lennon.

It worked: Lennon never did the tour, and Nixon was reelected.

Along the way, the FBI spied on and harassed Lennon — and kept detailed files of its work. The bulk of them were released in 1997 under the Freedom of Information Act after 15 years of litigation. I was the plaintiff.

But the agency continues to withhold 10 documents in Lennon's FBI file on grounds that they contain "national security information provided by a foreign government." The name of the foreign government remains classified, though it's probably not Afghanistan. The FBI has argued that "disclosure of this information could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security, as it would reveal a foreign government and information provided in confidence by that government."

U.S. District Judge Robert Takasugi rejected this argument in 2004 and ordered the documents released. The FBI is appealing that decision.

The Lennon FBI files vividly illustrate the administration's problem. "Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their government" — those are the words of President Bush in his 2003 executive order on classified information. And he is right.

The Freedom of Information Act is necessary because Democrats and Republicans alike have secrets they want to keep — secrets about corruption and the abuse of power. But now the White House wants to shield information from with a new rationale for secrecy — protecting the homeland from terrorists.

The administration acknowledges that it has dramatically increased the number of documents classified "confidential," "secret" or "top secret." Between the time Bush took office in 2001 and 2004, the most recent year for which figures are available, that number has nearly doubled. In 2004 alone, 80 federal agencies deemed 15.6 million documents off-limits. And that figure doesn't include documents withheld by Vice President Dick Cheney, who refuses to report to the National Archives the number of documents his office classifies even though Bush's executive order requires him to do so. Cheney claims his office is exempt.

The administration's frenzy on secrets has led to documents being reclassified after having been in the public domain for decades — for example, the number of bombers and missiles the U.S. had in 1971. The same year that the FBI began its surveillance of Lennon, Nixon's secretary of Defense testified before Congress and displayed a chart showing the U.S. had 30 strategic bomber squadrons and 54 Titan and 1,000 Minuteman nuclear missiles.

Thirty-five years later, Bush officials blacked out that information in the public version of the secretary of Defense's 1971 report, claiming it is now a national security secret. About 55,000 pages of previously declassified material in the National Archives were edited this way, mostly by the Air Force and CIA. (In response, the U.S. archivist announced last week that a declassification initiative would eventually return 85% of the withdrawn CIA materials to the shelves.)

The justifications for such decisions are often ridiculous. In the Lennon FBI files litigation, the government claims that our national security would be damaged if it discloses the sharing of intelligence between the U.S. and the unnamed foreign government. But Bush himself declared in a joint news conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair that "relations and cooperation between our intelligence services are essential to secure the people of our respective countries."

That makes me wonder: Could it be that the same British intelligence service provided Nixon with information about Lennon in 1972? All this suggests that the time has come to end what Thomas Blanton, director of the National Security Archive, calls "silly secrecy."

http://www.latimes.com/news/
opinion/commentary/la-op-
weiner10sep10,0,7745137.
story?coll=la-news-comm
ent-opinions



A Note From Me: Sorry about the past couple days with the lack of updates. I have been very busy studying for college exams(I have three exams within 6 days).

While Nixon campaigned, the FBI watched Lennon

In December 1971, John Lennon sang at an Ann Arbor, Michigan, concert calling for the release of a man who had been given 10 years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes. The song he wrote for the occasion, "John Sinclair," was remarkably effective. Within days, the Michigan Supreme Court ordered Sinclair released.

What Lennon did not know at the time was that there were FBI informants in the audience taking notes on everything from the attendance (15,000) to the artistic merits of his new song. ("Lacking Lennon's usual standards," his FBI file reports, and "Yoko can't even remain on key.") The government spied on Lennon for the next 12 months and tried to have him deported to England.

This improbable surveillance campaign is the subject of a new documentary, "The U.S. vs. John Lennon." The film makes two important points about domestic surveillance, one well- known, the other quite surprising. With the United States in the midst of a new domestic-spying debate, the story is a cautionary tale.

It focuses on the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the former Beatle used his considerable fame and charisma to oppose the Vietnam War. Lennon attracted worldwide attention in 1969 when he and Yoko Ono married and held their much-publicized "bed-ins" in Amsterdam and Montreal, giving interviews about peace from under their honeymoon sheets. Lennon put to music a simple catch phrase - "All we are saying is give peace a chance" - and the antiwar movement had its anthem. Two years later, he released "Imagine."

The government responded with an extensive surveillance program. Lennon's FBI files - which are collected in the book "Gimme Some Truth" by Jon Wiener - reveal that the bureau was monitoring everything from his appearance on "The Mike Douglas Show" to far more personal matters, like the whereabouts of Ono's daughter from a previous marriage.

The FBI's surveillance of Lennon is a reminder of how easily domestic spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law-enforcement purpose. What is more surprising, and ultimately more unsettling, is the degree to which the surveillance turns out to have been intertwined with electoral politics. At the time of the John Sinclair rally, there was talk that Lennon would join a national concert tour aimed at encouraging young people to get involved in politics - and at defeating President Richard Nixon, who was running for re-election. There were plans to end the tour with a huge rally at the Republican National Convention.

The FBI's timing is noteworthy. Lennon had been involved in high-profile antiwar activities going back to 1969, but the bureau did not formally open its investigation until January 1972 - the year of Nixon's re-election campaign. In March, just as the presidential campaign was heating up, the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to renew Lennon's visa and began deportation proceedings. Nixon was re-elected in November, and a month later, the FBI closed its investigation.

If Lennon was considering actively opposing Nixon's re-election, the spying and the threat of deportation had their intended effect. In May, he announced that he would not be part of any protest activities at the Republican National Convention, and he did not actively participate in the presidential campaign.

After revelations about the many domestic spying abuses of the 1960s and 1970s - including the wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr. - new restrictions were put in place. But these protections are being eroded today, with the president's claim of sweeping new authority to pursue the war on terror.

Critics of today's domestic surveillance object largely on privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try to hold on to power. "The U.S. vs. John Lennon" would be a sobering film at any time, but it is particularly so right now. It is the story not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being undermined.

NEW YORK In December 1971, John Lennon sang at an Ann Arbor, Michigan, concert calling for the release of a man who had been given 10 years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes. The song he wrote for the occasion, "John Sinclair," was remarkably effective. Within days, the Michigan Supreme Court ordered Sinclair released.

What Lennon did not know at the time was that there were FBI informants in the audience taking notes on everything from the attendance (15,000) to the artistic merits of his new song. ("Lacking Lennon's usual standards," his FBI file reports, and "Yoko can't even remain on key.") The government spied on Lennon for the next 12 months and tried to have him deported to England.

This improbable surveillance campaign is the subject of a new documentary, "The U.S. vs. John Lennon." The film makes two important points about domestic surveillance, one well- known, the other quite surprising. With the United States in the midst of a new domestic-spying debate, the story is a cautionary tale.

It focuses on the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the former Beatle used his considerable fame and charisma to oppose the Vietnam War. Lennon attracted worldwide attention in 1969 when he and Yoko Ono married and held their much-publicized "bed-ins" in Amsterdam and Montreal, giving interviews about peace from under their honeymoon sheets. Lennon put to music a simple catch phrase - "All we are saying is give peace a chance" - and the antiwar movement had its anthem. Two years later, he released "Imagine."

The government responded with an extensive surveillance program. Lennon's FBI files - which are collected in the book "Gimme Some Truth" by Jon Wiener - reveal that the bureau was monitoring everything from his appearance on "The Mike Douglas Show" to far more personal matters, like the whereabouts of Ono's daughter from a previous marriage.

The FBI's surveillance of Lennon is a reminder of how easily domestic spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law-enforcement purpose. What is more surprising, and ultimately more unsettling, is the degree to which the surveillance turns out to have been intertwined with electoral politics. At the time of the John Sinclair rally, there was talk that Lennon would join a national concert tour aimed at encouraging young people to get involved in politics - and at defeating President Richard Nixon, who was running for re-election. There were plans to end the tour with a huge rally at the Republican National Convention.

The FBI's timing is noteworthy. Lennon had been involved in high-profile antiwar activities going back to 1969, but the bureau did not formally open its investigation until January 1972 - the year of Nixon's re-election campaign. In March, just as the presidential campaign was heating up, the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to renew Lennon's visa and began deportation proceedings. Nixon was re-elected in November, and a month later, the FBI closed its investigation.

If Lennon was considering actively opposing Nixon's re-election, the spying and the threat of deportation had their intended effect. In May, he announced that he would not be part of any protest activities at the Republican National Convention, and he did not actively participate in the presidential campaign.

After revelations about the many domestic spying abuses of the 1960s and 1970s - including the wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr. - new restrictions were put in place. But these protections are being eroded today, with the president's claim of sweeping new authority to pursue the war on terror.

Critics of today's domestic surveillance object largely on privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try to hold on to power. "The U.S. vs. John Lennon" would be a sobering film at any time, but it is particularly so right now. It is the story not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being undermined.

NEW YORK In December 1971, John Lennon sang at an Ann Arbor, Michigan, concert calling for the release of a man who had been given 10 years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes. The song he wrote for the occasion, "John Sinclair," was remarkably effective. Within days, the Michigan Supreme Court ordered Sinclair released.

What Lennon did not know at the time was that there were FBI informants in the audience taking notes on everything from the attendance (15,000) to the artistic merits of his new song. ("Lacking Lennon's usual standards," his FBI file reports, and "Yoko can't even remain on key.") The government spied on Lennon for the next 12 months and tried to have him deported to England.

This improbable surveillance campaign is the subject of a new documentary, "The U.S. vs. John Lennon." The film makes two important points about domestic surveillance, one well- known, the other quite surprising. With the United States in the midst of a new domestic-spying debate, the story is a cautionary tale.

It focuses on the late 1960s and early 1970s, when the former Beatle used his considerable fame and charisma to oppose the Vietnam War. Lennon attracted worldwide attention in 1969 when he and Yoko Ono married and held their much-publicized "bed-ins" in Amsterdam and Montreal, giving interviews about peace from under their honeymoon sheets. Lennon put to music a simple catch phrase - "All we are saying is give peace a chance" - and the antiwar movement had its anthem. Two years later, he released "Imagine."

The government responded with an extensive surveillance program. Lennon's FBI files - which are collected in the book "Gimme Some Truth" by Jon Wiener - reveal that the bureau was monitoring everything from his appearance on "The Mike Douglas Show" to far more personal matters, like the whereabouts of Ono's daughter from a previous marriage.

The FBI's surveillance of Lennon is a reminder of how easily domestic spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law-enforcement purpose. What is more surprising, and ultimately more unsettling, is the degree to which the surveillance turns out to have been intertwined with electoral politics. At the time of the John Sinclair rally, there was talk that Lennon would join a national concert tour aimed at encouraging young people to get involved in politics - and at defeating President Richard Nixon, who was running for re-election. There were plans to end the tour with a huge rally at the Republican National Convention.

The FBI's timing is noteworthy. Lennon had been involved in high-profile antiwar activities going back to 1969, but the bureau did not formally open its investigation until January 1972 - the year of Nixon's re-election campaign. In March, just as the presidential campaign was heating up, the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to renew Lennon's visa and began deportation proceedings. Nixon was re-elected in November, and a month later, the FBI closed its investigation.

If Lennon was considering actively opposing Nixon's re-election, the spying and the threat of deportation had their intended effect. In May, he announced that he would not be part of any protest activities at the Republican National Convention, and he did not actively participate in the presidential campaign.

After revelations about the many domestic spying abuses of the 1960s and 1970s - including the wiretapping of Martin Luther King Jr. - new restrictions were put in place. But these protections are being eroded today, with the president's claim of sweeping new authority to pursue the war on terror.

Critics of today's domestic surveillance object largely on privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try to hold on to power. "The U.S. vs. John Lennon" would be a sobering film at any time, but it is particularly so right now. It is the story not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being undermined.

http://www.iht.com/articles/
2006/09/21/opinion/edcohen.php

Stella McCartney in Pregnancy Scare

Pregnant fashion designer and Stella McCartney was rushed to hospital early this week, after suffering bleeding and abdominal pains which raised concerns over her unborn baby.

The seven months pregnant Beatles heir, who`s expecting her second child, spent a night on 18 Sept at the Worcestershire Royal Hospital, where after undergoing several tests, she alongwith her baby was declared fine by the doctors, who later allowed her to go home on Tuesday.

However, she was strictly instructed to rest, and call a complete halt to all non-essential activity.

"She has been read the riot act," the Daily Mail quoted a source, as telling the Sun.

"Her condition was viewed as serious by doctors. Medics warned her she must rest completely up until the birth. This means total bed rest," the source added.

A witness at the hospital who saw Stella said: "She was completly distraught."

http://www.zeenews.com/
znnew/articles.asp?aid=3246
18&ssid=101&sid=ENT

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Paul McCartney opens up

“You’ll be met at the station,” teases Paul McCartney’s publicist, “where you’ll be blindfolded and driven to a secret location.” In fact, the assistant who picks me up and drives me in her battered estate car to McCartney’s Sussex recording studio couldn’t be friendlier. No walkie-talkie earpieces or security gates to speak of (although the phrase “hidden devices” almost certainly applies), just an unkempt gravel lane winding through lawns and past rose bushes to a group of buildings high on a ridge, overlooking the English Channel. Oh, and a windmill, naturally.

The property is a short hop from his farm, location of the infamous log cabin over which McCartney is currently in dispute with the planning officers. He is mired in certain other legal disputes, too, and the publicist is at pains to point out that questions on this are verboten. So Heather Mills- McCartney is off limits. Long may she stay that way.

Her estranged husband, far from looking weighed down with anxiety, exudes bonhomie. It is in stark contrast to his demeanour when I last interviewed him, five years ago.

At that time, he was emerging from the deep slough of despair that had claimed him following the death of his first wife, Linda, and was gearing up for his second marriage. Tellingly, he came across then as strident, hectoring, uncomfortable in his skin; he looked old and angry. Today, he is youthful in comparison. Putting the finishing touches to a new pop album, McCartney is doing what he has always done in adversity — seeking refuge, therapy, even, in music.

The only time in his life, he says, when he found this escape route blocked was when Linda died. Music was impossible. He cried for a year. “Life beats you down occasionally,” he says, in his Liverpudlian singsong, “and when it does, you just have to not try. But I am the eternal optimist. No matter how rough it gets, there’s always light somewhere. The rest of the sky may be cloudy, but that little bit of blue draws me on.”

This is one of two points in the interview where what is unspoken hovers, clamorously, in the air. We are sitting in a huge, memento-filled room above the studio, a space filled with light and with views out to sea, above which banks of stupendous clouds scud across a sky that is luminously, unmistakably blue.

You have to keep it together in a situation such as this. When, to illustrate a story he is telling, McCartney drags his sofa closer to the one I’m parked on and begins, “Working with John, like this, him there with his right-handed guitar and me here with my left-handed one”, you feel the finger of history running its nail up your spine. Ditto when you notice that his feet, famously bare on the Abbey Road sleeve, are unshod again. It is an effort to maintain concentration.

But we can dip in and out of all this.

In June, the $170m Beatles-based Cirque du Soleil show LOVE opened in Las Vegas. Last month, it was announced that the Fab Four’s ever alert Apple Corps is suing EMI over unpaid royalties. And in the past fortnight, it has been announced that the Casbah Coffee Club, in Liverpool, where the then Silver Beatles played their first gigs, has been awarded listed status; and that postage stamps bearing the Beatles’ faces are to be issued in January. “And in the end,” they sang in the closing bars of Abbey Road. But it never did end. It goes on.

I ask McCartney if, even now, he has moments where he wants to pinch himself, where he goes: “Eh?” He says at once: “Oh, yeah.” And, in an echo of those sharp early press conferences, where the Fabs toyed with their inquisitors, putting them to the sword with Scouse wordplay and wit, he says of the stamps: “I just want to be licked.”

He is back in the promotional fray to talk about Ecce Cor Meum, his new work for choir and orchestra, which he began working on eight years ago. It’s his fourth classical release, following Liverpool Oratorio, Standing Stone and Working Classical. None was especially well received, but then nor were the majority of his post-Beatles solo albums, nor his paintings, nor his book of poetry. In part, this is because the Lennonists have tended to John’s shrine with, it sometimes seems, burnt offerings in the form of McCartney’s poor-relation reputation. Back in 2001, the latter spat back at these snipers. “I, particularly, took a lot of flak with John,” he said.

“The break-up, and then, of course, when John died ... very tragically. Obviously, people’s sympathy is going to go to him, including mine,” he recalls. “But the picture did get a bit muddy. People did go over the top and say, ‘Well, it was only John, the other three were just hangers-on.’ When you’ve taken so much flak, you do think, enough’s enough.”

There is no trace of that anger today. Rather, he seems sanguine, more able to accommodate the whole mad journey he was a part of. And it is clear that he sees Ecce Cor Meum as very much another stage in that journey. This insistence on continuity, on a thread linking the Beatles with Wings, with his solo career, maddens detractors. But to him it is an inescapable fact. He got “in the vehicle”, as he calls it, when he was a boy, and he is still at the wheel today.

“I love choirs,” he says, explaining the alacrity with which he accepted Magdalen College, Oxford’s commission of a new choral work. “I was in one as a kid, St Barnabas at Penny Lane. And I tried out for Liverpool cathedral, and sort of got to the last stages. But” — and here his faces creases into a delighted grin — “I was not musical enough, obviously. At school, in terms of musical education, I got zero. We’d all go into the classroom, about 30 Liverpool boys, and the teacher would put on a record — Tchaikovsky, Beethoven, something like that — then he’d leave the room. So of course we just took it off, posted a guard on the door, got the ciggies and the cards out, and when he came back, we put the record back on for the last couple of bars. He’d go, ‘What did you think of that?’ And we were like, ‘Oh, really good, sir. Fabulous.’”

Ecce Cor Meum both benefits and suffers from this lack of training. Between reeling out the lines of melody and hauling them back in for each of the four movements’ conclusions, McCartney’s writing — which he did chiefly on a synthesizer, prior to orchestrating it — can potter pleasantly, if aimlessly. His extraordinarily forensic musical ear has picked up not just the rudiments, but somehow also the vernacular of English 20th- century choral and operatic music: echoes abound of Parry, Tippett, Vaughan Williams, William Henry Harris, Herbert Howells; more globally, Berlioz and Bernstein are clear creditors. Moreover, his untrained approach can produce moments of hair-raising modulation and digression. Interlude, which divides the piece, is the most shattering example of this. Set for oboe and choir, its wordless, lulling structure was written in tribute to Linda. “I’ve played it to some people,” says McCartney proudly, “and said nothing, and I’ve seen them welling up. It’s an amazing phenomenon,” he continues quietly. “How chords can be... sad.”

Writing Ecce wasn’t just a case of not following the rules, he says; it’s never been about only that. “We didn’t know the rules. I remember in the very, very early days in Hamburg, asking Tony Sheridan what he thought of one of our songs, and he said, ‘Well, it’s just a scale.’ So much of what we did (he starts to sing)...‘Last night I said these words’; so you’ve got to go, ‘To my girl.’” Again, the finger works up the spine. “You’ve got to break it and not have it too scaley. Scales are great, they’re hooky. But then you think, ‘Okay, now let’s get away from that, let’s do the one-note thing.’ I remember when I was writing She’s Leaving Home, trying to not change the chord.” He sings again. “So, you know, it’s ‘She’s... leaving... home’, and it just stays on that chord. So then, when it lets go, it’s lovely. You get the release.”

The crude characterisations of McCartney the soppy dramatist, Lennon the visceral diarist, were always just that: partisan simplifications that obscured far more than they unearthed. It was McCartney, after all, who first experimented with tape loops (a process that bore glorious fruit in Tomorrow Never Knows); who was into Berio and Stockhausen, and part-funded the avant-garde Indica gallery, where, ironically, Lennon first met Yoko. That all this is often overlooked is, McCartney says, because of what he calls “the surface image”. “I didn’t want to shout about them, but I’d like them on the record. But it is an image thing. Mine has always been a bit sort of clean-living or whatever, until” — and here he twinkles mischievously and pauses — “... not always.”

He is, he says, beginning to be able to assess what the Beatles achieved, what they meant, what they still mean. He found the Cirque du Soleil show very emotional. “Because it’s my mates, and because of the fact that it’s no more, except on record — physically no more. In the middle of the show, I was sitting next to Ringo, I was welling up, and I just turned to him and said, ‘F***ing great band. Listen to these noises. How did we do that?’” He is still making those noises; is still, he admits, in pursuit, hearing a chord, bumping into a phrase and off he goes.

Downstairs, post-interview, he takes me into the kitchen, where a table is laid with food, and makes me a doggy bag for the train, including a slice of sponge cake.

“Excuse fingers,” he says.

Like I was going to insist on an ex-Beatle using the tongs.

Briefly, I toy with putting the cake up for auction on eBay. But you know what? I ate it instead, fingerprints and all. But I kept the napkin he wrapped it in. As you would.

A life in music

1964 Things We Said Today Macca at his most plaintive and melodically meandering on this minor-key gem from A Hard Day’s Night.

1966 Eleanor Rigby McCartney’s most evocative lyric, and a song that did justice to The Times’s famous Schubert comparisons.

1968 Helter Skelter George called his record label Dark Horse, but it was McCartney, on this White Album, Manson Family-inspiring shocker, who emerged, black as night, from the Beatles stable.

1970 Maybe I’m Amazed People say Patti Boyd inspired great love songs (Something, Layla), but Linda did too.

1975 Listen to What the Man Said One of many songs where you think: nobody else would have bothered to write a bass line this complex and this beautiful.

1982 Here Today From the great Tug of War, the first album McCartney made after Lennon was killed, a heartfelt but unblinking ode to his erstwhile friend.

2001 Blackbird Singing McCartney mixed song lyrics with poetry in this book, writing movingly about Linda.

2005 Riding to Vanity Fair A return to old wounds on last year’s Chaos and Creation album? John’s ghost haunts it.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/
article/0,,2101-2366846_1,00.html

Thursday, September 21, 2006

I put the laughs inYellow Submarine

It may have been the decade of free love and free thinking but in Liverpool in the 1960s, even Paul McCartney thought poetry was "a bit too girly".

However, that didn't stop Roger McGough from following his dream of becoming a poet - and as anyone who grew up reading his verse will attest, that determination is something we should all be thankful for.

As one third of poetry collective The Mersey Sound with Adrian Henri and Brian Patten, McGough - who comes to the Arts Theatre on Sunday - managed to turn the stuffy image of poetry on its head with volumes of genuinely witty verse and sellout live performances.

It was after one of these performances that McCartney passed his less than favourable judgement on McGough and his oeuvre.

"I knew The Beatles through art college and my girlfriend, just to nod to and be jealous of even though they were slightly younger," he recalls. "They'd been to Hamburg and had posh leather jackets.

"Paul and George used to come to some things we did but they didn't think much of poetry, Paul told me that himself. He said him and John used to go to a bookshop called Phillips and Matthews and look at the poetry section. He said they quite liked Auden, but he thought poetry was a bit too far out, a bit too weird and girly."

Despite hanging out with musicians and hailing from one of the most important musical cities in the world, it was not an avenue he ever expected to go down himself. But that didn't stop him from having a number one hit with Lily the Pinkwith his band The Scaffold. The group couldn't play a note and so the likes of Elton John, Jack Bruce and Jimi Hendrix had to provide all the actual music for their records.

"My earliest albums always involved poetry and music." He tells scene. "I never used to do it much live but there was a lot of it, jazz musicians would do it because it was another gig but I was never really into jazz.

"I knew quite early on I wasn't a musician. I worked with all sorts of great musicians like Jimi Hendrix but you know that you are not a musician when you get with those kind of people. Sometimes I wish I was and I envy those people but I was always a writer and a poet."

And his abilities to craft the English language in new and exciting ways came in handy when The Beatles ventured into the cartoon world. Many people don't know about McGough's involvement with the animated psychedelic classic The Yellow Submarinebut that's because until recently, his name appeared nowhere in the credits.

"Every time you laughed or smiled at that film, that was me responsible," he says proudly. "But no-one knew it was me because that was part of the deal.

The Liverpudlian poet talks to NIK SHELTON about, Dylan, Brando, The Beatles and Salman Rushdie "I was invited to Liverpuddlianise it. There had been a lot of scripts and the one I got was by someone who was a Harvard professor, it was very erudite.

"I just came in to do a bit of script doctoring but there were a lot scenes that I wrote completely. When my agent tried to get me a credit the Americans behind it wouldn't have it.

"I didn't fight it at the time because it didn't seem that important and I had other things to do. I could tell people but they wouldn't believe me because my name wasn't on screen. It was only in retrospect that I thought, 'That was really mean'."

This and other fascinating tales of a life in words and language are told in his new autobiography Said and Done,which he will be reading from during his appearance in Cambridge.

Among other things, the book relates his encounters over the years with his idols from singers and actors like Bob Dylan and Marlon Brando to fellow scribes Allen Ginsberg and Salman Rushdie.

That he has a big enough audience to write an autobiography and tour with a one man show is testament to the effect his work has had on the nation over the past 40 years. He emerged at a time when the only poets anyone had ever heard of were dead.

But the literary landscape looks a lot different now.

"There weren't any poets when I was growing up. It wasn't until my 20s I heard about the jazz poets in London like Laurie Lee.

That seemed so far off and sophisticated. In Liverpool there was nothing.

"It's a bit more accessible now. When I started doing Mersey Sound it wasn't long after I'd stopped teaching and there was very little poetry in schools.

"The only thing was the Palgrave's Golden Treasury of Verse that I'd had at school.

Nowadays there are so many poets who write for children as well; Brian Patten, John Agard, Benjamin Zephaniah.

"These are names children will know so there's been a breakthrough in that sense."

Roger McGough is at the Cambridge Arts Theatre on Sunday at 7.45pm.

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/
lifestyle/stage_screen/
news/2006/09/21/45bf1dcd-e35a
-4eac-84be-4bcc095bf8bf.lpf

Top Ten Songs by the Beatles

By: A. Bertocci

The legendary Beatles catalog is so full of hits, of inspiration, of beauty and of tears that a top ten list is a futile effort as best, an unpleasant one at worst. To preface such a list with a lame disclaimer is, by contrast, easy. All too easy. What you have here didn’t come from a master of music theory or a noted rock journalist. Just a fan with some great memories of his favorite band. It will have to do for now.

(1) Let it Be
Stripped down to the bare essentials of a voice and a piano, it doesn’t take long for this song’s simple words and message to grip the audience and provide something instantly hummable and endlessly comforting. You truly realize the depth of the musical genius when a ‘wrong’ chord at the three-minute mark sounds suspiciously correct. Somehow it all fits.

(2) A Day in the Life
But simplicity only gets you so far. The fusion of two different compositions from John Lennon and Paul McCartney, the full and sumptuous arrangement of this epic, impressionistic piece provides a tour of life both real and imagined, from the mundane to the spectacular. Featuring everything from an improvised orchestral crescendo to an alarm clock to a powerful three-piano final chord, it is a masterpiece of complex composition and revolutionary production.

(3) Hey Jude
The sheer audacity of a seven-minute song comprised largely of “na-na-na-na” is tribute to the musical imagination of the Beatles. Everything, even Ringo’s late entry into the piece, comes together for a listening experience that gets people chanting even today.

(4) Penny Lane
Is it the joyous ascension or the jovial, almost casual downbeats, that make people remember the trumpets? This surrealist ode to English suburban living. Now if people would just stop stealing the street signs in Liverpool.

(7) Eleanor Rigby
With moving, poignant lyrics about loneliness and aging, “Eleanor Rigby” is a striking example of the Beatles’ brilliant transition into serious songwriting. To truly appreciate it, one must listen to the strings-only recording on the Anthology compilation, and immerse oneself in the eight-piece orchestra’s somber dirge. Pop grows up, and it is beautiful.

(8) Yesterday
The most frequently covered and recorded song in all of popular music, its haunting melody is so simple that even Paul McCartney could not believe no one had come up with it before.

(9) Strawberry Fields Forever
Psychedelic rock came into its own with John Lennon’s peaceful musical trip; it’s no wonder Lennon’s final, sweet, (mostly) silent resting place came to bear the name Strawberry Fields. Don’t forget to listen for the famous “Cranberry sauce” murmurs at the end.

(10) I Want to Hold Your Hand
The famous “British invasion” was spearheaded by this infectious hit. The face of American music was changed forever by the influence of this newfangled Fab Four. With every triumphant leap up the scale on “hand!”, a new era in music was reached. Oh, and it’s fun, too. Of course, the British already knew it all along. And listening to the blissful confidence in Lennon and McCartney’s voices, they knew, too.


By Liz Herrin

Sergeant Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Revolver, Hard Day’s Night, Help!, Magical Mystery Tour, The White Album. The list of timeless and revolutionary albums seems almost unreal. How could one band have so many hits?
I’d probably have trouble picking out the top 10 Beatles albums lent alone songs. So acknowledging that it’s enough of a task just to pick out the top ten hits, there’s no way I can go so far as to rank them.
With that in mind, here’s my list in no particular order. (And please don’t respond with angry emails informing me which Beatles gem I left off the list. I’m aware some hits are going to be left behind in the dust of my all too cursory list.)

1.Twist and Shout
Why it made the list: This pop rock anthem has enough snap, crackle and pop to make a mummy move. Well…that might be stretching it slightly, but it’s certainly catchy.
It’s one of those immediately recognizable songs that sneak into feel good films like Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (think the parade scene when Ferris takes over a float and Ferris’ unsuspecting dad dances in his high-rise office.)
It puts a smile on my face after the first familiar bar, and that alone is reason enough to put it on my list.

2.A Hard Day’s Night
Why it made the list: Come on. Any song that gets an entire movie named after it deserves to make the top list.
But I have to admit, my reasoning for adding it to the list is much stranger than just an appreciation for the Beatle’s ability to cross media mediums. I laugh every time I think of this song because of an old Saturday Night Live “Celebrity Jeopardy” skit. The category is “Words that rhyme with dog.” Alex Trebek (Will Ferrell) asks his celebrity guests to finish this sentence—It’s been a hard day’s night, I should be sleeping like a…this. Sean Connery (Daryl Hammond) quickly buzzes in. Trebek looks hopeful. “Yes, Sean Connery.” “Chinese whore!” Connery seems so sure of his answer, so proud. It’s hysterical, and single-handedly earns A Hard Days’s Night a coveted spot on my list.

3.Help!
Why it made the list: Again, if it engenders a film, it probably deserves to be on the list. At least the song version of Help! wasn’t as atrocious as the film version (don’t hate me hardcore Beatles fans…)


4.Drive My Car
Why it made the list: I’ve always loved this song. My dad used to blast it while we were on family road trips. (My siblings and I cultivated a love for the Beatles this way.) So for the sake of personal nostalgia, on the list it goes.

5.Yesterday
Why it made the list: This song is just plain haunting. There are certain songs that by virtue of their sappy nature and slow rhythm become staples for weddings, graduations, christenings…you name it.
And while Yesterday is admittedly present at many of these milestones, it’s always meaningful and perpetually heartfelt. It’s not sugarcoated, and it doesn’t feel the need to apologize for that. I respect that enough to add it to my list.

6.Eleanor Rigby
Why it made the list: Granted, the line, “Waits at the window, wearing the face that she keeps in a jar by the door” has always intrigued me and is just sufficiently strange enough to secure it on the list.
But the real reason is that I had to play this song in my high school orchestra. After learning a song and playing it for months, one gains a new appreciation for it.

7.I am the Walrus
Why it made the list: Some people say they don’t even listen to the lyrics of a song, and this never ceases to shock me. Lyrics can really make or break a song for me, and in the case of this song, it absolutely makes it (not that the music isn’t phenomenal as well).
This stanza was the clincher:
Yellow matter custard, dripping from a dead dog's eye.
Crabalocker fishwife, pornographic priestess,
Boy, you been a naughty girl you let your Knickers down.
I am the eggman, they are the eggmen, I am the walrus,
goo goo gajoob
Now I don’t pretend to know what that means, but I know I like it.

8.Strawberry Fields Forever
Why it made the list: Somehow this seems like such a definitive Beatles songs I just had to put it on the list. If I didn’t, it would be like having a Bob Dylan Best Of and not including The Times They Are A-Changin’. It just wouldn’t seem right.

9.Come Together
Why it made the list: The constant stops and starts of this song are what make it so classic. The rhythm of the song never lets you get comfortable, and consequently it feels innovative when you listen to it.
Not to mention the creative things they do with lyrics. I particularly like the paralleled lines “He got hair down to his knee” in the fist stanza and “He got feet down below his knee” in the third.

10.Tax Man
Why it made the list: There’s quite a bit of political angst loosely hidden behind its pop music veneer. Don’t tell me you don’t hear a smidgeon of anger in the chorus:
(if you drive a car, car;) - I’ll tax the street;
(if you try to sit, sit;) - I’ll tax your seat;
(if you get too cold, cold;) - I’ll tax the heat;
(if you take a walk, walk;) - I'll tax your feet.
Great music with a message? It had to make the list.


http://www.associatedcontent.com/
article/60973/top_ten_songs_
by_the_beatles.html?page=2

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

New Book: The Unreleased Beatles

Music fans might think they've heard it all from the Beatles, the most popular band ever. But even hardcore Beatles fanatics will learn about a treasure trove of undiscovered material in Backbeat Books' newly published The Unreleased Beatles: Music & Film.

The staggering wealth of unreleased material encompasses the Beatles' entire career, from a recording of the Quarrymen on July 6, 1957 (also known as "the day John met Paul"), right up to outtakes from the final sessions of Let It Be in 1970.

It's all here: unreleased studio outtakes, BBC radio recordings from 1962-1965, live concert performances, home demo recordings, fan club Christmas recordings, other informal recordings done outside of EMI studios, and even a wrap-up of Beatles compositions that were never recorded.

The visual treasures uncovered by author Richie Unterberger are just as tantalizing: Super-8 film of an early, unknown performance; 1962 footage from the Cavern Club; four songs from a 1963 Swedish TV show; never-broadcast rehearsal footage from The Ed Sullivan Show; UK, French, German, Japanese, and Australian television specials; unseen film from the 1965 Shea Stadium concert; promo films; footage of the band's trip to India; and more.

The book includes chronological entries for all of the Beatles' unreleased recordings of note, as well as all of the unreleased video footage from 1961-1970 and outtakes from 1990s interviews filmed for Anthology. There's also a general overview of Beatles bootlegs, Beatles songs recorded by other artists in the '60s, and more than 100 photos of documenting the full range of unreleased material.

Richie Unterberger is the author of Backbeat's Unknown Legends of Rock 'n' Roll; Turn! Turn! Turn!: The '60s Folk-Rock Revolution; and Eight Miles High. He has written numerous CD reissue liner notes, and he co-edited the All Music Guide to Rock.

http://www.whatgoeson.com/
story.200609201.html

Sunday, September 17, 2006

McCartney Divorce: Mill's Video Diary Vexes Paul

Heather Mills' video diary of her divorce from Paul McCartney has the ex-Beatle worrying about his personal business finding its way to reality TV.

The dish from the Daily Mail a few weeks back was that Mills was recording the ongoing split to provide her with a hammer as the proceedings work their way to a final settlement.

The newspaper indicated at the time that sources confirmed Paul was worried his estranged wife's new body of work might turn into a TV series with Heather conveniently cast as the victim.

A spokesman for Mills said the former model was actually recording the antics of the paparazzi wolf pack that has followed her every move since the breakup.

McCartney has reportedly offered his estranged $72 million to divorce and never discuss their marriage in public.

http://www.postchronicle.com/
news/original/article_21239538.shtml

The U.S. Vs. John Lennon

The new documentary "The U.S. vs. John Lennon," which opens Friday Sept. 15 in New York and Los Angeles (and nationwide Sept. 29), tells the story of Lennon's transformation from loveable moptop to anti-war activist, and recounts the facts about Nixon's campaign to deport him in 1972 in an effort to silence him as a voice of the peace movement.

In the film, Walter Cronkite explains that J. Edgar Hoover "had a different conception of democracy" from the rest of us; George McGovern talks about losing the 1972 election to Nixon; Sixties veterans Angela Davis, Bobby Seale, John Sinclair and Tariq Ali recall their movement days; and G. Gordon Liddy happily explains the Nixon point of view: Lennon was "a high profile figure, so his activities were being monitored."

Those "activities" – planning a concert tour that would combine rock music with antiwar organizing and voter registration for the 1972 election – were stopped cold by Nixon's deportation order; but more than 30 years later, in the 2004 election, another group of rock stars finally did exactly what Lennon had been thinking about doing.

Although the Lennon film never explicitly connects the Vietnam war to Iraq, it's impossible not to think of the present when Nixon is shown saying, "as South Vietnamese forces become stronger, the rate of American withdrawal can become greater" (and then wipes sweat off his upper lip). But there's only one explicit reference to the present in the film, and it's brief: Gore Vidal says "Lennon represented life, and Mr. Nixon, and Mr. Bush, represent death."

The real star of the film of course is Lennon, whose biting wit shines through. On his way to his deportation hearing, a newsman says, "You say you've been in trouble all your life – why is that?" "I'm just one of those faces," he replies; "people never liked me face." (I worked on the film as historical consultant, and appear in it briefly.)

Nixon got the idea of deporting Lennon from an unlikely source: Strom Thurmond, Republican Senator from South Carolina, who sent a letter to the White House in 1972 that outlined Lennon's plans for a U.S. concert tour that would combine rock music with antiwar organizing and voter registration. Thurmond knew that 1972 was the first year 18-year-olds were given the right to vote, and that Nixon, up for reelection, worried about 11 million new voters — who were probably all Beatle fans and mostly anti-war. Thurmond's memo observed that Lennon was in the U.S. as a British citizen, and concluded "deportation would be a strategic counter-measure."

It worked; the Lennon tour never happened.

For the next 30 years, the idea of a tour combining rock music and voter registration languished, until 2004, when Bruce Springsteen and a group of activist rock musicians did an election year concert tour of battleground states with a strategy very much like Lennon's. The "" tour, organized by MoveOn PAC, brought the Dixie Chicks, R.E.M., Pearl Jam, and a dozen others on a tour of swing states, with the explicit goal of getting young rock fans to register to vote and vote against the Republican in the White House.

If the idea of using rock concerts to register young voters was the same, the 2004 tour had different politics from its 1972 predecessor – that much is clear from the one concert Lennon did do before the deportation order came down: the "Free John Sinclair" concert in Ann Arbor in December, 1971. Sinclair was a Michigan activist who had been in prison for two years for selling two joints of marijuana to an undercover cop; 15,000 people turned out for the concert. "The U.S. versus John Lennon" features footage from that concert, including wildly radical speeches by Jerry Rubin, and Bobby Seale, who said "the only solution to pollution is a people's humane revolution!"

The Vote for Change tour had much less political talk, and much milder rhetoric. On opening night in Philadelphia in October, 2004, Bruce Springsteen made only a brief political statement: "We're here to fight for a government that is open, rational, forward-looking and humane," he said – not quite the same as Jerry Rubin at the 1972 concert shouting "what we are doing here is uniting music and revolutionary politics to build a revolution around the country!"

The 2004 effort was much bigger and better organized than what Lennon had in mind. It included thirty-three concerts on a coordinated schedule that moved from battleground state to state. On opening night a month before election day the focus was Pennsylvania. Springsteen played in Philadelphia, the Dixie Chicks played Pittsburgh, Dave Matthews did State College, Pearl Jam was in Reading, John Mellencamp in Wilkes-Barre and Jackson Browne and Bonnie Raitt in Erie. The next night they all moved to Ohio, then Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Florida, and then a giant finale brought everyone together in Washington, DC.

Of course 1972 and 2004 ended the same way – with the re-election of the Republican incumbent. In '72, Nixon won by a landslide; in 2004, Bush barely won the popular vote – you might call that progress.

One factor has remained the same over the last 35 years – young voters are the least likely to vote, and potentially a rich source of progressive support. The challenge of overcoming their apathy and ignorance remains – as does the strategy of reaching them through music. Thus what Lennon thought about in 1972, and what Bruce Springsteen, the Dixie Chicks and others did in 2004, remains a key to mobilizing young voters in the future.

As Lennon says in "The U.S. vs. John Lennon," "our job now is to tell them that there still is hope, we must get them excited about what we can do again."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/
2006/09/15/opinion/
main2014623.shtml

Saturday, September 16, 2006

U2 can walk across Abbey Road, Bono

Is the iconic shot for the album Abbey Road which has been copied by thousands of Beatles fans. But this time, the fans re-enacting the famous walk outside the Abbey Road studios can say they know a bit about music themselves.

Bono and U2 were joined by American rockers Green Day for a photo opportunity while the two bands recorded a duet together. And on hand to catch the moment on video was Bob Geldof, who was filming proceedings in the studio.

The studio was the birthplace to most of the Beatles records, and countless other classic albums from Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon to Radiohead's Kid A.

According to U2's website the two bands will re-record a version of The Skids' 1978 post-punk classic The Saints Are Coming.

The track should be featured on the album which the Irish supergroup have been recording at the famous studios during the past week.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/
entertainment/2006-09/
15/content_689934.htm

Beatles Club Was Given Protected Heritage Status

The Casbah Coffee Club was given Grade II Listed status on the recommendation of conservation body English Heritage. The designation means the venue, which still contains original artwork and musical equipment, is of "special architectural or historic interest" and cannot be demolished. Bob Hawkins of English Heritage said the club was "in a remarkably well-preserved condition with wall and ceiling paintings of spiders, dragons, rainbows and stars by original band members along with 1960s musical equipment, amplifiers and original chairs.

In the early part of 1959 Mrs Best (Mo) watched a television programme about a coffee bar in London, it was called The Two Eyes Café and with a constant stream of London beat groups it was proving to be very successful. There was nothing like it in Liverpool. An idea was born, and the very next day Pete Best and Rory Best with a host of friends began to clear the cellars of their large Victorian house. The venue that was to become the Casbah.

They were going to have their own coffee bar, they were going to have Liverpool beat groups playing there and it was going to be called The Casbah Coffee Club. George had two friends who weren't doing anything. They were John Lennon and Paul McCartney. The group was formed and they performed as The Quarrymen on the opening night of the Casbah.

The Quarrymen disbanded. John, Paul, George, and their latest recruit Stuart Sutcliffe had gone through name changes and avery lack lustre tour of Scotland. They still came to the Casbah regularly to socialise. It was here that they watched ex-band membe Ken Brown with his new group The Blackjacks, featuring Pete Best, perform.

Paul McCartney made the approach for Pete Best to join the Silver Beatles. They had an offer to play in Hamburg, Germany. Pete auditioned, passed with flying colours, and became a member of the group. The week leading up to their departure for foreign shores the group rehearsed relentlessly at the Casbah. Somewhere between Liverpool they agreed the 'Silver' should be permanently dropped from the band's name.

On the 17th of December 1960 The Beatles played their first Liverpool date at the Casbah. They blew the roof of the place, the audience couldn't believe what they were seeing, and so it was that Beatle mania began.

The building, still owned by the Best family, features murals and paintings by members of the band and by Lennon's first wife, Cynthia. After many years, the Casbah is once again open to the public. The Casbah is only 3.5 miles from Liverpool city centre and easy to get to by car, taxi or bus.

http://home.nestor.minsk.by/
jazz/news/2006/09/1601.html

Friday, September 15, 2006

George Harrison's Label Give iTunes The Cold Shoulder

The Beatles’ own label Apple Corps has had a long-standing run in with Apple over the company selling music products.

Now it’s been alleged that Harrison’s label EMI are releasing the album digitally later this month but without using Apple as an avenue.

As BBC6music reports, the album will be available through ‘a variety of digital services’, although which ones are yet to be confirmed.

‘Living in the Material World’ charted at number one when it was originally released back in 1973.

http://www.gigwise.com/
news.asp?contentid=22239

McCartney fails to win over council planners

Paul McCartney failed to resolve his differences with his local council today, despite offering to demolish one of his houses on his sprawling country estate to save a log cabin built without planning permission.

The rock legend has been locked in a dispute with planning officers over the secluded timber lodge and gym built in the grounds of Woodlands Farm in Brede Lane, Peasmarsh, near Rye, East Sussex.

In a supporting statement on behalf of the ex-Beatle to Rother District Council, McCartney, 64, previously said he needed the two-bedroom lodge for “privacy, seclusion and security“.

However, the council refused him retrospective planning permission for the structures, because it said they harmed the landscape quality of the High Weald area of outstanding natural beauty.

The council’s refusal, plus the threat of enforcement action, led to McCartney offering to demolish a three-bedroom detached house in his grounds, known as Beanacres, and two agricultural barns, to compensate for being allowed to keep his lodge.

Today, planning councillors met at Bexhill Town Hall but declined to back the recommendation of officers to approve the scheme, prolonging the stand-off between McCartney and council planners.

McCartney was not present at the meeting as councillors instead voted in favour of a site visit to his country estate. Photographs and drawings of the site had failed to satisfy some members of the impact the changes would have.

Councillor David Vereker said: “If we go along this route we will be creating a very, very difficult precedent.”

Councillor Keith Standring questioned why a solid house like Beanacres should be granted demolition approval when there was a need for housing in the district.

Councillors heard that McCartney’s plan was being opposed by Peasmarsh Parish Council, whose officials said they might recommend consent if he offered a “planning gain” to the village, such as social housing.

Head of planning Frank Rallings said a site inspection will be arranged before the next planning committee on October 12.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/
breaking/story.asp?j=225
562660&p=zz5563
475&n=225563546&x
=

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Book reveals John Lennon regretted Jesus remark

Forty years ago John Lennon was embroiled in a controversy over his statement that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus. However, as is revealed in a new book, Lennon later regretted making the comment and for a brief period in the 1970s experimented with Christianity.

In his new book The Gospel according to the Beatles, author Steve Turner tells for the first time how Lennon made contact with the television evangelist Oral Roberts in 1972 confessing his dependence on drugs and asking what Christianity could do for him. "Is it phoney?" he asked. "Can He love me? I want out of hell."

The Beatle enclosed a gift for the Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and after reminding Roberts that he'd once sung the line "money can't buy me love" said; "It's true The point is this, I want happiness. I don't want to keep on with drugs."

Roberts sent Lennon a copy of his book Miracle of Seed Faith. "I thank God that you finally regret thinking any man or group could be more popular than Jesus," he wrote in the accompanying letter. "Jesus is the only reality."

There is no record of any further correspondence between the Beatle and the evangelist although five years later he became enamoured of Pat Robertson's The 700 Club and Franco Zeffirelli's film Jesus of Nazareth. For a period of around two months he considered himself a born-again Christian and peppered his conversations with exclamations of "Praise the Lord!"

http://www.whatgoeson.com/
story.200609131.html

Beatles convention sure to be fab-tastic

Beatlemania is about to hit Toronto. The Toronto Beatle Celebration promises to be the biggest Fab Four convention ever held in Canada. Dave McGinn spoke to convention producer David Goyette.

Q The convention sounds huge, but will it be bigger than Jesus?

Goyette: Bigger than Jesus? This is a matter of judgment, isn't it? It is without doubt the biggest Beatles convention we've ever had in Toronto or in Canada.

Q Former Beatles drummer Pete Best will be at the convention, as will John Lennon's former companion Mary Pang and a slew of musicians from the Beatles' heyday. Was it hard to get them to come?

Goyette: My co-producer is a fellow by the name of Peter Miniaci, who's the president of the Toronto Beatlemania shop. He's known all of these folks for quite some time and has good working relationships with them. It's one of the reasons we're able to attract people to our event that other conventions have not been able to.

Q Why are Star Trek conventions nerdy while Beatles' conventions are cool?

Goyette: What's cool about it, I suppose, is that for many people, particularly people of the Boomer age, Beatles music represents a kind of cultural anthem for the times.

Q: The cover band that will be there, 1964 The Tribute, which Rolling Stone once called the best Beatles tribute band in the world -- do they have bowl cuts?

Goyette: They do. They are stitch for stitch, guitar for guitar, amp for amp, perfection in every way. They cover the period roughly from 1964 to 1966. It's exactly like seeing the Beatles.

Q: Paul McCartney has never given his backing to any Beatles convention, but he gave it to this one. How'd you score that?

Goyette: This is a coup without any doubt. This is the first time any Beatle ever has given his blessing if you will to a Beatles convention anywhere in the world. We had decided early on that we would contribute some of our revenues to a charity of choice, and the charity we decided on was called Adopt a Minefield. It seemed to be timely because of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. It turns out that McCartney took kindly to this because he's a goodwill ambassador for the Adopt a Minefield movement. He got in touch with the Canadian Landmine Foundation who got in touch with us and said, 'Would you like some support and recognition?' We were just floored.

Q Who's your favourite Beatle?

Goyette: My traditional answer has been John Lennon. But I think because of Paul's letter I'm going to switch my alliance.

Q: There's plenty of guests coming from around the world. Are many of them Canadian?

Goyette: We were determined to make sure we had sufficient Canadian talent and local talent. For example, there's a guy from Halifax named Hal Bruce. His claim to fame is he is a regular at the Liverpool Beatle convention. He's a one-man band and he does every Beatles song ever recorded -- if you want -- in a row.

Q: Awesome.

Goyette: Yeah.

- The Toronto Beatles Celebration runs Sept. 16-17, Queen Elizabeth Building and Queen Elizabeth Theatre, Exhibition Place.

http://www.canada.com/cityguides/
toronto/story.html?id=d6f65e48-
ea35-44be-83d7-cbaa03eb9e5a&k=597

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Sean Lennon's Second Record

Friendly Fire, the sophomore solo album from Sean Lennon, will be released by Capitol Records on October 3rd.

Following Into the Sun, Lennon’s acclaimed 1998 solo debut, Friendly Fire is a cinematic suite of songs which share the same dizzying wealth of musical styles as its predecessor, but eschews some of its freeform tendencies for more traditional song structure and some unifying themes.

The years between albums found Lennon collaborating with everyone from his mother, Yoko Ono, to Money Mark, Deltron 3030, Handsome Boy Modeling School, Vincent Gallo, Thurston Moore, John Zorn, Ryan Adams, The Boredoms, and Ben Lee, to name a few. But they also provided him with the opportunity to let Friendly Fire evolve naturally, at its own pace, and to limit participation to talented friends, of which he’s blessed with many.

“There was a long period after the first album where I felt disillusioned with the machinery of the industry,” says Lennon. “It’s not that I stopped recording, playing and performing, I did all of those things, just more discreetly. Friendly Fire is an experiment to see what it might be like to do music more publicly again.”

Produced by Lennon, the Friendly Fire sessions really got underway when he asked producer/engineer Tom Biller (among other things Jon Brion’s trusted mixer for his recordings with Fiona Apple and Kanye West, as well as the scores for Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and I (Heart) Huckabees) and drummer Matt Chamberlain (Pearl Jam, Tori Amos) into the studio for two weeks of collaboration.

Where Lennon played most all instruments on his debut, the Friendly Fire sessions found him still writing most of the parts, but conjuring a shape-shifting “band” to record live to tape, mostly in single takes. Other participants included Jon Brion (organ, guitar, additional drums), Cibo Matto’s Yuka Honda (piano, keyboards, bass), Harper Simon (guitar) and Bijou Phillips (background vocals), among others.

A childlike piano prelude introduces sweeping album opener “Dead Meat,” the sweetest, most lush-sounding song to ever warn “In the end you’re gonna learn/All you get is what you deserve.” Similarly, the dark romanticism of the gentle, melodic “Parachute” intones “If I have to die tonight/I’d rather be with you.”

The smoky, endearingly spooky “Tomorrow” is a cursed lovers’ ballad picked up via deep-space transistor radio. Driven by handclaps and acoustic strumming, “Headlights” is most propelled by its gracefully-unfolding vocal harmonies. And a near-unrecognizable psychedelic reworking of Marc Bolan obscurity “Would I Be the One” floats and disperses before the album’s final track, and perhaps its most literal, the forlorn and orchestral “Falling Out of Love.”

Lennon has also produced a short film for each of the album’s tracks, directed by Michele Civetta. The fantastical shorts, which together comprise a conceptual film about betrayal and the failure of love, feature appearances from Lennon and friends including Lindsay Lohan, Bijou Phillips, Asia Argento, Carrie Fisher, Devon Aoki, Jordana Brewster and others.

As for the experience of creating Friendly Fire the album versus Friendly Fire the film Lennon says, “Music is invisible. I spend a lot of time in the studio with my eyes closed. This, thankfully, was not the case with the film.”

http://www.filter-mag.com/
artists/interior.212.html

Donald Trump blames Paul McCartney for his divorce mess

With the way the ongoing bitter divorce battle between Sir Paul McCartney and his estranged wife Heather Mills has shaped up, property tycoon Donald Trump has said that McCartney was solely to blame for the mess he found himself in today.

Macca's decision for not writing up a pre-nuptial agreement before marrying the former model has been labeled "idiotic" by twice-divorced Trump, who believes that McCartney shouldn't have allowed romance to cloud his judgment, as business should always come before love.

"I know I sound like a broken record, but get a prenup. I don't care how much you love your fiancée, it's just idiotic to get married without one," Contactmusic quoted Trump, as saying.

"Don't believe me? Ask Paul MCCartney what he thinks. I know he wishes he had one."

McCartney and Mills separated in May (06) and are currently in the process of getting a divorce.

http://news.sawf.org/
Entertainment/20753.aspx

Beatles album covers made into stamps

The Royal Mail is saluting the Beatles in January by releasing six commemorative stamps illustrated with memorable album covers.

The set includes ran image of "With the Beatles," released in 1963, which was the group's second album. In the United States, it was the first Beatles album to be released and was titled "Meet the Beatles."

Others in the series include "Help!" (1965), "Revolver" (1966), "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" (1967), "Abbey Road" (1969) and "Let It Be" (1970).

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/
pop/1403AP_Beatles_Stamps.html

Monday, September 11, 2006

McCartney's lyrics reveal break-up bitterness

Sir Paul McCartney wrote songs about his failing marriage more than a year before he broke up with Heather Mills, it has emerged.

Friends have told how he poured out his heart in his album last year with several thinly-veiled comments about the relationship.

In the album - Chaos and Creation In The Backyard - McCartney appears to accuse his 38-year-old wife of humiliating him, shunning his attempts to rebuild their friendship and preferring publicity to love.

One of the most startling examples comes in the bitter track Riding to Vanity Fair, which at the time some claimed could have been about Geoff Baker, the PR man he sacked, or even John Lennon.

The song, according to friends, has much more to do with Miss Mills, who gave an interview to the American magazine weeks before their marriage in 2002.

'All Paul's emotions and troubles because of the marriage to Heather are in that song,' one close friend told the Sunday Mirror yesterday.

'He is saying how the love has gone out of their relationship and is putting the blame squarely on Heather.

'Paul tells Heather how she has humiliated him and treated him like a fool. He says he was prepared to put up with that treatment because he loved her. He wrote how he permanently wanted her to be his friend.

'But the song says she turned down the chance - because she was more interested in publicity.

'Paul was using Vanity Fair to symbolise her love of the limelight generally.'

One line says: 'I was open to friendship, But you didn't seem to have any to spare, While you were riding to Vanity Fair.' The song was recorded at the Ocean Way Recording Studio in Los Angeles last March, 14 months before 64-year-old Sir Paul decided to end their fouryear marriage. The album, released in September last year, reached number ten in the UK charts.

Other songs such as Friends To Go, Certain Softness and Anyway, viewed with the benefit of hindsight-all suggest more than a hint of Heather as inspiration.

The News of the World claimed Sir Paul and his wife were close to agreeing a £40million divorce settlement. But a source close to Miss Mills denied this.

Paul's omen in a song

Riding To Vanity Fair
'You can put me down, But I can laugh it off, And act like nothing's wrong You're not aware, Of what you put me through, But now the feeling's gone I was open to friendship, But you didn't seem to have any to spare, While you were riding to Vanity Fair.'

Friends To Go 'I've been waiting till the danger is past, I don't know how long the storm is gonna last, if we're gonna carry on I'll be waiting on the other side, for your friends to go.'

Certain Softness 'A kind of wildness, in her style, haunts my memory, more than I ever thought it would, A touch of wildness, in her style, got me hooked.'

Anyway 'If we could be, closer longer, That would help me, help me so much, We can cure each other's sorrow, Won't you please, please, please get in touch.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
pages/live/articles/showbiz/
showbiznews.html?in_article
_id=404507&in_page_id=1773

A Picture and A Thousand Words

As leader of the Beatles and as a solo artist, in timeless anthems such as "All You Need Is Love," "Give Peace A Chance" and "Imagine," in bed with Yoko Ono, at press conferences, concerts and demonstrations, John Lennon did something that nobody in pop culture had every done before and really hasn't done since — use his fame to help mobilize a generation of young people to choose love and peace instead of violence and war.

In 1969, Lennon was one of the most famous people in the world. The last thing he needed was more attention. But taking advantage of the world media's obsession with him and his marriage to Yoko Ono, the couple decided to use their fame in a remarkable and controversial campaign for peace.

Integrating politics with his music, Lennon's activism, as one observer notes in our film, was "the conscious use of one's myth to project a political and social goal."

Lennon (working with his artist wife) developed messages that were easily understood — most memorably, "Give peace a chance" and "War is over! If you want it." Beyond any mere slogan, though, Lennon put himself out front through his art, continually offering the world unfiltered glimpses of the human being behind the ideas. Though some of the tactics marginalized Lennon — the press ridiculed him and Ono relentlessly for their "Bed-In" — nothing would deter him.

And when during the next few years the media attention Lennon could command was used in outspoken support for other radical causes, he nearly got thrown out of the United States.

To a certain extent, Lennon understood promoting his beliefs could get him in trouble, but he probably didn't anticipate the extent of the ensuing backlash from the press and the government. Some in the media even went so far as to say he was, in the words of one New York Times reporter seen in our film, "living in a `never, never land.'" But his efforts clearly had an impact, evident in the Nixon administration's harsh response.

Lennon's opposition to the Vietnam War and his association with "enemies of the state" took place during one of the most fractious periods of American history, one in which, as former U.S. Senator (and 1972 Democratic Presidential nominee) George McGovern noted, had the U.S. divided "as it had not been since the Civil War."

What made Lennon so dangerous? Perhaps the main reason this rock musician was seen as a threat to Nixon was that, prior to the 1972 election, the voting age had been lowered to 18. When word got out that Lennon was planning a concert tour to encourage voter participation (a "Vote For Change" style tour), as declassified government documents show, he became a real target of the administration. The Nixon administration feared millions of new young voters — millions of Beatles fans — might be swayed to vote against their man.

The FBI tapped Lennon's phone and had agents outside his apartment. Eventually, Senator Strom Thurmond suggested that Lennon needed to be neutralized, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service moved to revoke Lennon's visa and deport him.

These frightening and outrageous tactics might seem unbelievable, but in the U.S., during times of war, serious challenges to the constitution have often become part of American life. Which is why, even though The U.S. vs. John Lennon is a film about what happened 35 years ago, it feels like a movie about today.

Lennon is seen and heard talking about the responsibility we all have to effect change. He knew what it took to move any population or generation from apathy to activism, which is why his ideas, art and actions — not to mention what the White House did to him for expressing those ideas, and the battle he fought for what he believed in — become an ever more relevant story.

With images of war and violence bombarding us constantly — the recent conflict on the Lebanon-Israel border, the war in Iraq, genocide in Africa — it's a good time to talk about peace. But can anybody's voice rise above the clutter the way Lennon's did?

Mention "rock star" activism in 2006 and U2's Bono comes immediately to mind. Bono, who counts Lennon as a major influence, has used his celebrity to become a true statesman, doing tremendously important work on issues such as Third World poverty.

And yet there is something about Lennon that remains uniquely inspiring, perhaps explaining why the generations at advance screenings of The U.S. vs. John Lennon raised different, but ultimately similarly poignant questions. "Where is our John Lennon?" younger audiences wondered. "Where is John Lennon when we need him?" asked the baby boomers.

There is no doubt we need more persistent, powerful voices like his. But rather than remain in our safety zones as we wait for this generation's Lennon to emerge, we should heed his message — "War is over! If you want it" — and each embrace our own duty to engage. Lennon understood he could not do it alone, and his experience showed that standing by your convictions carries great risks. But if artists, politicians, and everyday people did it together, we could open an honest discussion of the issues that are defining our world today. And we could identify and embrace sacrifices that would allow us to create the future we desire.

So yes, it's time to talk about peace — and it's time to rock the boat.

Meanwhile, the Lennon that has inspired generations remains where he has always been — in the music. The measure of great art is its eternal meaning, and it is clear that Lennon's art remains relevant. We are still engaged by the musical dreamer, by his intelligence and charisma, and by the courage with which he used his art to espouse the cause of peace and fight the U.S. government.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/
ContentServer?pagename=thestar
/Layout/Article_Type1&
;c=Article&cid=115780081
2144&call_pageid=970599119419


Online Degrees